STATEMENT DELIVERED BY H. E. MR. FELIPE PÉREZ ROQUE,
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, AT THE HIGH-LEVEL SEGMENT
OF THE 61st SESSION OF THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Geneva, 16 March 2005
(Original in Spanish. Check against delivery)
Excellencies:
The Commission on Human Rights – despite the efforts by those who
honestly believe in its importance and wage a battle to return it to
the spirit of respect and cooperation of its founders – has lost
legitimacy. It is not credible. It allows the impunity of the
powerful. It is handcuffed. In it, there are plenty of lies, double
standards and empty speeches by those who, while enjoying their
wealth, squander and pollute, look the other way and pretend not to
see how millions of human beings endure the violation of the right
to life, the right to peace, the right to development, the right to
eat, to learn, to work; in brief, the right to live in dignity.
We all knew that the Commission on Human Rights was victim to the
political manipulation of its work because the Government of the
United States and its allies have used the Commission as if it were
their private property – and have turned it into some sort of
inquisition tribunal to condemn the countries of the South and,
particularly, those who actively oppose their strategy of
neocolonial domination.
But in the course of the last year, two events took place that
change the nature of the debate that we will hold these days.
The first was the European Union's refusal to co-sponsor and vote in
favor of the draft resolution that proposed to investigate the
massive, flagrant and systematic human rights violations still
committed today against over 500 prisoners at the naval base that
the United States keeps, against the will of the Cuban people, in
the Harbor of Guantánamo. The European Union, that always objected
to no-motion actions, was willing this time to present it in order
to even prevent any investigations whatsoever against its ally. In
terms of hypocrisy and double standards, it was the straw that broke
the camel's back. What will it do this year, after the dissemination
of the heinous pictures of tortures at the prison of Abu Ghraib?
The second event was the release of the report presented by the High-
Level Group on Threats, Challenges and Change, set up at the
initiative of the UN Secretary-General. It categorically states
that "the Commission cannot be credible if it is seen to be
maintaining double standards in addressing human rights concerns."
Should we then wait for the representatives of the United States and
its allies to come up with self-criticisms at this plenary session
and undertake to work with us, Third World countries, to rescue the
Commission on Human Rights from disrepute and confrontation?
Mr. Chairman:
The guarantee of the enjoyment of human rights today depends on
whether you live in a developed country or not – and it also depends
on the social class that you belong to. Therefore, there will be no
real enjoyment of human rights for all as long as we fail to achieve
social justice in the relations among countries and within countries
themselves.
For a small group of nations represented here – the United States
and other developed allies – the right to peace has already been
achieved. They will always be the attackers and never the ones under
attack. Their peace rests on their military power. They have also
achieved economic development, based on the pillage of the wealth of
the other poor countries that were former colonies, which suffer and
bleed to death for those to squander. However, in those developed
countries, incredible as it may seem, the unemployed, the immigrants
and the impoverished do not enjoy the rights that are most certainly
guaranteed for the rich.
Can a poor person in the United States be elected Senator? No, they
cannot. The campaign costs, on average, some US$ 8 million. Do the
children of the rich go to the unjust and illegal war in Iraq? No,
they do not go. None of the 1,500 American youths killed in that war
was the son of a millionaire or a Secretary. The poor die there
defending the vested interests of a minority.
If you live in an underdeveloped country the situation is worse,
because the overwhelming majority, poor and hopeless as it is,
cannot exercise their rights. As a country, there is no entitlement
to peace. It can be attacked under the accusation of being
terrorist, of being an "outpost of tyranny" or under the pretext
that it is going to be "liberated." It is bombed and invaded
to "liberate it."
Nor can the over 130 countries in the Third World exercise the right
to development. Beyond their efforts, the economic system imposed on
the world prevents so. They have no access to markets, to new
technologies; they are handcuffed by a burdensome debt that has
already been paid off more than once. They just have the right to be
dependent countries. They are led to believe that their poverty is
the result of their mistakes. In those countries, the poor and the
indigent, who account for the majority, do not even have the right
to life. For that reason, every year we see the death of 11 million
children under five years of age, a portion of which could be spared
with barely a vaccine or oral rehydration solutions – and also the
death of 600,000 poor women at childbirth. They have no right to
learn to read and write. It would be dangerous for the owners. They
are kept in ignorance to keep them docile. That is why this
Commission should be ashamed of the nearly 1 billion illiterate
people in the world. That is why in Latin America 20 million
children endure ruthless exploitation as they work on the streets
instead of going to school.
The Cuban people strongly believe in freedom, democracy and human
rights. It took them a lot to achieve them and are aware of its
price. It is a people in power. That is the difference.
There cannot be democracy without social justice. There is no
possible freedom if not based on the enjoyment of education and
culture. Ignorance is the cumbersome shackle squeezing the poor.
Being cultivated is the only way to be free! – that is the sacred
tenet that we Cubans learned from the Apostle of our independence.
There is no real enjoyment of human rights if there is no equality
and equity. The poor and the rich will never have the same rights in
real life, proclaimed and recognized as these may be on paper.
That is what we Cubans learned long ago and for that reason we built
a different country. And we are just beginning. We have done so
despite the aggressions, the blockade, the terrorist attacks, the
lies and the plots to assassinate Fidel. We know that the Empire is
chagrined by this. We are a dangerous example: we are a symbol that
only in a just and friendly society; that is, socialist, can there
be enjoyment of all rights for all citizens.
Therefore, the Government of the United States attempts to condemn
us here at the Commission on Human Rights. It is afraid of our
example. It is strong at the military level but weak on the moral
front. And morality, not weapons, is the shield of the peoples.
Perhaps this year President Bush will find some Latin American
country – of the few docile ones that are left – to present the
notorious resolution against Cuba. Or perhaps it will return to an
Eastern European government like the Czech, which enjoys as nobody
else its condition of satellite of Washington and Trojan Horse
within the European Union. Or perhaps it will be presented by the
very Government of the United States, which is now blackmailing,
threatening and counting endorsements to know if Cuba's condemnation
can be achieved.
Everybody in this hall knows that there is no reason to present a
resolution against Cuba at this Commission. In Cuba, there is not a
single – and there has not been ever in 46 years of Revolution – an
extrajudicial execution or a missing person, not even one! Let
anyone come up with the name of a Cuban mother who is still looking
for the remains of her murdered son or daughter! Or a grandmother
searching for her grandchild handed over to another family following
the parents' murder! Let anyone here come up with the name of a
reporter killed in Cuba – and 20 of them were murdered in Latin
America only in 2004! Let anyone come up with the name of a prisoner
vexed by his keepers, a prisoner ordered down on his knees, prey to
terror, in front of a dog trained to kill!
Excellencies:
President Bush has a plan for Cuba, but we Cubans have a plan of a
different sort. We Cubans have a clear idea about our course. And
nobody will move us away from it. We will build an even more just,
more democratic, more free and more cultivated society. In brief,
more socialist.
And we will do so although President Bush threatens us with
aggressions, to return to colonized Cuba, to oust Cubans from their
homes, their land and their schools to turn them over to the former
Batista-style owners who would come back from the United States. We
will do so despite his plan to privatize health and turn our doctors
into unemployed beings; we will do so despite the plan to privatize
education and make it accessible only to the elite, as it was in the
past; we will do so despite the plan to auction off our wealth and
the heritage of all the people to US transnational corporations.
Despite the plan to remove the rewards from our retirees and
pensioners to force them back on a job, according to the so-called
Plan of Assistance to a Free Cuba.
The Cuban people are entitled to defend themselves from aggression
and they will. And I must say it clearly: in Cuba, we will not allow
the establishment of organizations and mercenary parties financed by
and at the service of the US Government. We will not allow
newspapers and TV networks funded by the US Government to uphold its
policies of blockade and its lies among ourselves. In Cuba, the
press, the radio and the TV are owned by the people and serve and
will serve their interests.
We will not cooperate with the Representative of the High
Commissioner or with the spurious resolution behind her. Why is it
not such a prestigious lawyer appointed Special Representative of
the High Commissioner to the Guantánamo Naval Base? Why is she not
asked to investigate the flagrant violations of the rights of five
courageous and pure Cuban youths imprisoned in the United States and
their families? Because it cannot be done. Because it is about the
human rights violations committed by the United States and they are
untouchable. It can be done against small Cuba but not against the
United States.
But Cuba will not give up on its fight, Excellencies. Nor will it
surrender. Nor will it make concessions or betray its ideals.
And we will see if a free, cultivated and united people can be
defeated! We will see if they can overthrow a government of the
people, whose leaders walk among them with the moral authority
derived from the total absence of corruption and the full dedication
to their duties!
We will see if they can deceive everybody all the time!
Excellencies:
The Commission on Human Rights before us today is illustrative of
the unjust and unequal world in which we live. There is no longer
nothing left in it from the friendly and respectful spirit that
brought its founders together after the victory over fascism.
Therefore, the Cuban delegation will cease to insist that we must
transform the Commission. What we have to change is the world, go to
the roots. A Commission on Human Rights without selectivity,
politicization, double standards, blackmail and hypocrisy will only
be possible in a different world.
Cuba does not consider that to be a dream, but a cause well worth
fighting for. That is why it fights and it will continue to do so.
Thanks.
Thank you very much.
|